Iām glad I watched the Mustang video before hearing you talk about it. That way I felt genuine satisfaction about guessing the twist before it appeared. If I had heard you talk about it first, that satisfaction would have been deprived from me. Itās the definition of spoiling the experience.
How does Scott not understand this? Iāve no idea.
How does he keep insisting that this satisfaction is meaningless as a factor to my enjoyment of entertainment? No idea.
Itās really mind boggling. Truly remarkable how bloodiminded he is on this point when he is so obviously wrong.
I donāt know if it was because it was spoiled or if it is because itās actually not funny or fun, but the Mustang video isnāt funny, or fun. Itās a guy who gets hit by some horses. There was no joy in me watching it and I donāt understand how that was a thing of the day, maybe, I guess, if it was a surprise because I was expecting a car rather than horses? But I was told it was a horse, I was expecting a horse, and I got a horse, it was okay, I guess.
I donāt even try to argue that unspoiled experiences are inherently better! I take the much simpler position that they are different and I canāt even get him to admit to that.
I guess I could spoil the entire end of Adventure Time for himā¦
I canāt help but laugh a bit when you comment āGo right aheadā right when Iām literally moving my hand to the mouse to click the post button on a reply saying āHeās just going to tell you to do it.ā
I never believed in spoilers to begin with. Studies just came along and supported my existing position. Got any studies coming out supporting your position?
No, but Iāve explained all my issues with your one study about mystery stories read by a small number of teenage college students in previous threads, and explained how that same study about mystery stories as read by teenage college students doesnāt apply to my enjoyment of stories and jokes.
A joke only works by setting up expectations then subverting that expectation. Weāve seen already that when watching that video knowing someone is going to be hit by a horse, the video is nothing more than someone being hit by a horse. Itās no longer a joke, just an accident.
Anyway, my point wasnāt to explain again how wrong you are, but to convey how astounded I am that you still insist you are right.
Why is it equally hilarious every time I watch it? Itās no less funny when I watched it just now than the first time I saw it and already suspected it would be a horse.Seems like itās still a joke to me.
For what itās worth, Scott is right on spoilers, says I. I enjoy things MORE* not less when Iāve read a summary of them. My enjoyment shifts from āwhatās gonna happenā to āhowās the thing that I know is gonna happen, gonna actually happenā
I enjoy watching things that are āspoiledā the way everyone enjoys watching One Punch Man. You know heās gonna punch the bad guy, in a sense, that show has a spoiler in the title. How and when though?
That right there was me reading A Player of Games the first time knowing full well how it ended.
I personally donāt enjoy things more or less, mostly because I tend to forget any spoilers unless Iām told literally right when Iām watching it. My memory is not always so good.
I donāt know about the rest of you, but I actually enjoy moments when I watch or read something where I get to go, āWait, theyāre not going toā¦ holy crap they did!ā
Some of my favorite moments in media come from experiencing a shocking moment, reveal, or twist. Of course, you canāt have that experience more than once, but those moments often stick with me for a LONG time. Iām specifically thinking of some from close to 15 years ago.
You are all using the word wrong. A spoiler isnāt just āknowing what is going to happenā, itās about removing the possibility of an emotional or intellectual response to something, or reducing the impact of that response from someone who wants to maximize it.
If the response isnāt based on knowing what is going to happen, then it isnāt a spoiler. If the person hasnāt remembered what is going to happen, it isnāt a spoiler. If the person is incapable of having an emotional or intellectual response to something, it isnāt a spoiler.
I do not understand what you just said. What is an emotional or intellectual response?
Not generally, I donāt tend to understand things in general terms I need a specific example.
So like, by reading the sparknotes of Jane Eyre before reading the novel Jane Eyre have I deprived myself of the āemotional or intellectual responseā?
Also I feel I should elaborate slightly. I only have this pro spoiler policy in reference to myself. For others I respect their wishes to the best of my ability. However, for me Iāve learned the best way to really enjoy seeing/watching something for the first time is to learn as much about it as I can beforehand. Such as the plot, characters and, ending.
In certain Buddhist and Hindu theology lectures Iāve listened to god could have any life. God has lead lives filled with luxury and bliss but it gets boring and predictable doing that. So god hides from himself. Your life, thatās what he has picked this time, because itās more interesting for him to be be you and not to know whatās happens next. And when you die, youāll remember who you really are and you will choose again.
God, in this particular mythology, has set up the entire cosmos to avoid spoilers.
If a work of art is of high quality then it is impossible to remove or reduce the emotional or intellectual response it confers to its audience. It will make its full impact every single time. i.e: If a work of art can be spoiled, itās crap and not worth your attention in the first place. If it is good, then it canāt be spoiled, so go ahead and try as hard as you want to spoil it.